Cultivating Unlikely Leadership in DevOps: A Transformational Approach
Uncover the surprising potential within your DevOps team.
Embrace the Unpolished Gem
Every DevOps team has its hidden talents—those unsung heroes quietly working behind the scenes, waiting to shine. The key to fostering leadership within your team is recognizing these unpolished gems and giving them the opportunity to grow. Take, for instance, an anecdote from a previous project we managed. There was a junior developer named Mike who, despite his limited experience, had an uncanny knack for pinpointing inefficiencies in our CI/CD pipelines.
One day, while tweaking some scripts, Mike suggested an alteration that could save us roughly 20% in deployment time. His idea was met with skepticism initially, but after a quick proof of concept, it was clear he was onto something big. Implementing his suggestion not only saved significant time but also empowered him as a leader within our team.
To cultivate such leaders, we need to encourage experimentation and celebrate innovative solutions. Encourage your team members to step out of their comfort zones. Use pair programming or code review sessions to expose them to different aspects of your tech stack. By creating an environment where people feel safe to suggest and implement changes, you’ll naturally foster leadership from unexpected places.
Encourage Failure, Celebrate Learning
It’s often said that failure is the stepping stone to success. In the fast-paced world of DevOps, this couldn’t be more true. Encouraging your team to embrace failure without fear can unlock untapped leadership potential. One approach we’ve found effective is implementing “failure retrospectives”—special meetings dedicated to analyzing what went wrong and what can be learned from it.
For example, during one of our major deployments, we experienced a critical system outage that lasted longer than any of us would like to admit. While the initial reaction was panic and finger-pointing, we decided to hold a failure retrospective instead. This allowed everyone involved to openly discuss the incident, identify root causes, and propose solutions without the fear of retribution. Not only did this help us prevent similar outages in the future, but it also encouraged several team members to take the lead in implementing new monitoring tools.
This culture of learning from mistakes can turn even the most disastrous setbacks into opportunities for leadership growth. Just remember, the goal isn’t to fail, but to learn from failures. Reinforce this mindset by recognizing those who actively participate in retrospectives and apply their lessons learned.
Leverage Code Reviews as Leadership Tools
Code reviews are more than just a way to catch bugs—they’re a golden opportunity to develop leadership skills within your team. By involving junior team members in the process, you’re giving them the chance to learn from experienced developers and contribute their insights.
In one of our projects, we had a policy where every piece of code had to be reviewed by at least two different people. This practice led to lively discussions about best practices and architecture decisions, which helped improve the quality of our codebase significantly. Moreover, it gave our less experienced developers the confidence to voice their opinions and challenge the status quo.
Here’s a snippet of a typical code review comment:
// Original Code
if (user.isAdmin) {
grantAccess();
}
// Suggested Improvement
// Consider checking if the user is active before granting admin access
if (user.isAdmin && user.isActive) {
grantAccess();
}
By promoting such discussions, you’re not only improving the quality of your code but also empowering team members to step into leadership roles. Make code reviews a collaborative process and encourage everyone, regardless of their experience level, to participate actively.
Implement Mentorship Programs
Mentorship is a powerful tool for nurturing leadership within your DevOps team. Pairing seasoned professionals with newcomers can accelerate the growth of both parties. The mentor gets the chance to hone their leadership skills, while the mentee gains valuable insights and guidance.
Consider setting up formal mentorship programs, where mentors and mentees are matched based on their interests and goals. This could involve regular one-on-one meetings, project collaborations, or even shadowing opportunities. For example, we once paired a senior engineer with a promising intern to tackle a particularly tricky automation project. The result? A streamlined process that saved us countless hours and a budding leader in the making.
Mentorship doesn’t have to be a one-way street. Encourage mentees to share fresh perspectives and ideas. This reciprocity can lead to innovative solutions and create a supportive environment where leadership naturally flourishes.
Foster Open Communication Channels
Open communication is the lifeblood of effective leadership. In the complex world of DevOps, where cross-functional teams must work seamlessly together, clear and honest communication is vital. As leaders, we need to create an environment where team members feel comfortable sharing their thoughts, questions, and concerns.
Consider using collaborative tools like Slack or Microsoft Teams to facilitate real-time communication. These platforms allow for quick exchanges of information and enable team members to seek help or provide input when needed. Additionally, regular team meetings and check-ins can help ensure everyone is on the same page and any potential roadblocks are addressed promptly.
A real-world example of open communication leading to leadership occurred during a high-stakes project with a tight deadline. By keeping communication channels open, we were able to quickly identify and resolve issues, ultimately delivering the project on time. This collaborative effort highlighted the leadership skills of several team members who stepped up to coordinate tasks and ensure smooth progress.
Encourage your team to communicate openly, and watch as leadership blossoms across all levels of your organization.
Measure Success and Provide Feedback
Leadership isn’t just about taking charge—it’s about achieving results. To develop leadership within your team, it’s essential to measure success and provide constructive feedback. Establish clear metrics and KPIs to track progress, and use these insights to guide your team’s development.
Take advantage of tools like Jira or Asana to monitor project milestones and individual contributions. Regularly review these metrics with your team, discussing areas for improvement and celebrating successes. For example, if you notice a team member consistently excelling in automating tasks, acknowledge their efforts and encourage them to share their expertise with others.
Feedback should be timely, specific, and actionable. Avoid vague comments like “Do better next time” and instead focus on concrete examples and suggestions for improvement. For instance, if a team member struggles with a particular aspect of their role, offer additional resources or mentorship to help them grow.
By regularly measuring success and providing constructive feedback, you’ll help your team members develop their leadership skills and contribute more effectively to your organization’s goals.
Support Diversity and Inclusion in Leadership
Embracing diversity and inclusion in leadership can lead to more innovative solutions and stronger teams. Different perspectives bring unique ideas and approaches to problem-solving. As DevOps leaders, it’s crucial to create an inclusive environment where everyone feels valued and has the opportunity to lead.
One way to support diversity and inclusion is by actively seeking out diverse candidates for leadership roles. This might involve expanding your recruitment efforts or reassessing your evaluation criteria to ensure they are fair and unbiased. Additionally, consider offering training and resources to help team members from underrepresented backgrounds develop their leadership skills.
Our own experience in promoting diversity and inclusion within our DevOps team led to a notable increase in creativity and collaboration. By valuing different perspectives, we were able to tackle complex challenges with innovative solutions and achieve outstanding results.
Encourage your team to embrace diversity and inclusion, and you’ll not only foster a more inclusive workplace but also uncover untapped leadership potential.
Create a Culture of Continuous Improvement
A culture of continuous improvement is essential for developing leadership within your DevOps team. Encourage your team members to constantly seek ways to enhance processes, tools, and workflows. By fostering a mindset of growth and learning, you’ll naturally nurture leadership qualities among your team.
Implement regular feedback loops and retrospectives to identify areas for improvement and celebrate achievements. Encourage your team to explore new technologies, attend workshops, or participate in online courses to expand their knowledge and skillset. Provide opportunities for team members to share their insights and discoveries with others, fostering a culture of collective learning and growth.
For example, we once organized a “DevOps Day” where team members presented lightning talks on various topics related to our work. This event not only showcased the wealth of knowledge within our team but also inspired several members to take on leadership roles in driving new initiatives.
By promoting a culture of continuous improvement, you’ll empower your team to take ownership of their growth and development, ultimately strengthening your organization’s leadership capabilities.




And the hard part is making “safe to fail” mean something when prod is involved. We tried failure retros after a k8s config mistake, but people still worried the notes would show up in performance reviews. One person stopped volunteering ideas after that, which was the opposite of what we wanted. Pairing on a risky IaC change helped more because nobody felt like they were alone. Our MTTR improved a little, but mostly because folks started asking for help sooner. It doesnt happen just because a meeting has a friendly name.
At our size, every new reviewer adds topology opinions and a small AWS bill, so two approvals can become a distributed systems seminar. Still, rotating PR reviewers is cheaper than discovering an unowned service in prod, speaking from embarrasing experince
please cover how outage learning changes customer roadmap dates.
The mentorship section feels very familiar to me. We run GitLab CI with Terraform and AWS, and I learned more by pairing with our senior engineer than from any training course. Last month I noticed a repeated manual step in our deployment notes and asked if we could automate it. It was a small change, but it made me much more confident about suggesting improvements. My manager did not have to call it leadership for it to feel like progress. I would love to see more teams make room for that kind of learning.
i like the idea of juniors reviewing code, but it needs time protected for it. our PR queue gets rushed whenever a release is close, so nobody explains the why. could you do a follow-up on coaching review comments without slowing shipping?
Our feature store outage lasted 47 minutes because an upstream schema changed. A follow-up on measuring whether postmortem actions actually reduce recurrence would be useful; learned lessons dont count if incidents repeat.
Measuring recurrence is the part that usually disappears after the postmortem… we write the action items, then the next release is already on fire. We had a checkout outage caused by a stale frontend config, fixed it, then a similar config issue came back months later because nobody checked whether the guardrail was actually used. I would track the action item to a test or alert, not just mark it done, otherwise it is paperwork with better typography
After 18 incidents, our dashboard has become a tiny-font wall that nobody reads, including me. More monitoring tools can raise cognitive load faster than leadership, which is apparently my special talent.
“More monitoring tools” is where I start reaching for the smaller font, unfortunately. A dashboard is not really a monitoring tool, though, it is the display layer, and ours became a kind of haunted wallpaper after a payment API outage. We added six panels after that incident, then nobody could agree which alert meant the thing was actually broken. William is right that the people who understand it all become the unofficial emergency crew. At my job, I am mostly trying to ship my tickets without accidentally becoming the dashboard historian, so perhaps this says more about my limits than observability. If a screen needs a guided tour during an outage, it probably isnt helping
I have not tried a formal mentorship program yet, but I plan to ask about one at work. How do you match people when the team is small and everyone is already busy? I disagree with celebrating failure as a phrase, because it can sound like the outage itself was acceptable to the people affected by it. Would it be better to celebrate the investigation and the repair instead? We had a deployment issue last year, and I noticed the quietest person had the clearest questions afterward. Could regular code review discussions help identify people like that before there is a problem?
I would want evidence that two-reviewer rules improve outcomes, not just confidence. Management already argues that extra PR time means we need more headcount. Our k8s team lost a day to a bad prod rollout, yet the budget conversation was still only about delivery speed. If MTTR drops after these changes, is that because of reviews or because the team finally got better monitoring? We need numbers before asking for a program with meetings and mentors. Otherwise this becomes another IaC initiative that gets cut at planning time!
Ceremoines made the headcont case easier with finance.
We had the build pipeline go down during a homepage launch… everyone suddenly became a CI expert, nobody could ship. code reviews can teach people, sure, but when the frontend bundle takes 22 minutes, the review discussion turns into waiting around. I have seen the same people step up every outage, then burn out quietly
the same pattern shows up in data work when the pipeline is slow or broken: a few people become the default responders. during a feature pipeline outage, our analysts waited on one engineer who knew the dependency graph, and their planned work simply stopped. review and incident work need explicit capacity, or they become invisible overtime
saving 20% on deployment time sounds useful, but does it measure leadership or just a faster github actions pipeline… management will ask whether it reduced incidents, headcount pressure, or cloud spend, and theyre not wrong.
My previous employer called those blameless postmortems rather than failure retrospectives. How do you keep them from becoming another recurring meeting when there was no meaningful incident? We used a short written review first, which helped people think before the discussion